Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Andreas Hirczy wrote: > >> >> I'd rather prefer not to increase -cb, since this seems to be not our >> usual usage pattern. > > Increasing -cb is pretty cheap; IIRC it's about 32 bytes of memory per > callback, and the runtime overhead only comes into play at shutdown.
My impression was that 1Mi is already plenty; but increasing to 4 Mi with an additional memory usage of just 96 MiBytes is no big deal. > My draft change to auto-tune fileserver parameters for a target memory > footprint at https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/c/11629/ just uses all the > remaining memory footprint after the other parameters are tuned for > callbacks. Thanks - I will have a look at it and use it as a guide to further manual tuning. Best regards Andreas -- Andreas Hirczy <[email protected]> https://itp.tugraz.at/~ahi/ Graz University of Technology phone: +43/316/873- 8190 Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics fax: +43/316/873-10 8190 Petersgasse 16, A-8010 Graz mobile: +43/664/859 23 57 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
