On 2/22/2011 6:44 PM, Steven Dake wrote: > Clearly the iterate loop is wrong as is, and your patch is correct, but > I'm curious, does this fix a specific bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677975 :) Fabio > > Thanks > -steve > > On 02/22/2011 06:42 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jan Friesse <[email protected]> >> --- >> exec/objdb.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/exec/objdb.c b/exec/objdb.c >> index dc36236..884263b 100644 >> --- a/exec/objdb.c >> +++ b/exec/objdb.c >> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void object_reload_notification(int startstop, >> int flush) >> } >> >> for (list = tmplist.next, tmp = list->next; >> - list != tmplist.prev; list = tmp, tmp = list->next) { >> + list != &tmplist; list = tmp, tmp = list->next) { >> >> tracker_pt = list_entry (list, struct object_tracker, >> object_list); >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openais mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
