On 02/23/2011 12:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > On 2/22/2011 6:44 PM, Steven Dake wrote: >> Clearly the iterate loop is wrong as is, and your patch is correct, but >> I'm curious, does this fix a specific bug? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677975 > > :) > > Fabio > >> >> Thanks >> -steve >> >> On 02/22/2011 06:42 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Friesse <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> exec/objdb.c | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/exec/objdb.c b/exec/objdb.c >>> index dc36236..884263b 100644 >>> --- a/exec/objdb.c >>> +++ b/exec/objdb.c >>> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void object_reload_notification(int startstop, >>> int flush) >>> } >>> >>> for (list = tmplist.next, tmp = list->next; >>> - list != tmplist.prev; list = tmp, tmp = list->next) { >>> + list != &tmplist; list = tmp, tmp = list->next) { >>> >>> tracker_pt = list_entry (list, struct object_tracker, >>> object_list); >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openais mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais >
Ya, thanks for link to bz, Reviewed-by: Steven Dake <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
