Hi, On Wednesday, 30 June 2010 at 16:42, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've written an 3D alignment class that performs Kabsch alignment of > two 3D structures (whose atoms are in the same order). It can handle > symmetry and has the option to only align certain atoms (typically > non-H atoms). It can also be used to align a set of arbitary vectors. > > The thing is...it has a dependency on Tim's symmetry code which uses > bliss. bliss is GPLv2 and available from > http://www.tcs.hut.fi/Software/bliss/. My code also has a dependency > on Eigen2. > > Now, is it okay to dump bliss into the include directory? This will, > in any case, be a requirement for merging Tim's new symmetry code > which I think can how handle 95% of tricky symmetry cases, and is > probably ready to merge.
Speaking from a Fedora package maintainer point of view, I'm against bundling any separately available code. Please don't bundle it without adding support for building against a system-wide bliss installation. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries for complete justification why. > How about Eigen2? Should I just optionally compile? Same as above. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
