> Would an easier fix be to simply replace I agree with Noel's suggestion.
>> I have a patch that will fix this behavior sufficiently for my >> purposes. I would like to commit this upstream, but I thought I would >> ask first since this would modify a core utility function and could >> very well break code that expects this behavior. Well, the idea is to introduce it to trunk, check if "make test" still passes everything, and then we wait to see if it introduces bugs (e.g., in other formats). My guess is "no" since code written to use tokenize anticipates that all tokens on the line would be parsed. -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
