Thanks all for their feedback. I have committed a fix as per Dr.
O'Boyle's suggestion as well as preliminary support for periodicity in
the MOPAC reader (a new feature in MOPAC 2007 and 2009).

Thanks,

 · Jiahao Chen · MIT Chemistry ·



On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:48, Geoffrey Hutchison
<ge...@geoffhutchison.net> wrote:
>> Would an easier fix be to simply replace
>
> I agree with Noel's suggestion.
>
>>> I have a patch that will fix this behavior sufficiently for my
>>> purposes. I would like to commit this upstream, but I thought I would
>>> ask first since this would modify a core utility function and could
>>> very well break code that expects this behavior.
>
> Well, the idea is to introduce it to trunk, check if "make test" still passes 
> everything, and then we wait to see if it introduces bugs (e.g., in other 
> formats).
>
> My guess is "no" since code written to use tokenize anticipates that all 
> tokens on the line would be parsed.
>
> -Geoff
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-Devel mailing list
OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel

Reply via email to