Hi Noel, On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Noel O'Boyle <baoille...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > I eat my words, Marcus - you were right. We should have been using the > CMake build system for the bindings, rather than using distutils for > Python, something else for Ruby, and so forth. There were various > reasons we (or I rather) took that decision, but they are overwhelmed > now by the maintainence problems we've had as people move to new > systems (64-bit Macs especially).
It is always nice to hear I was right ;-) We have built quite a bit of logic into CMake to handle various platforms and architectures. I was largely concerned about the disconnect between the distutils (and friends) and the CMake understanding of the place you are installing to. I am traveling right now, but will happily take a look at the changes. If you hit any bugs please let me know, I would like to try and get any issues fixed up in CMake too. Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
