Looks good, but not all the Confab code is in there. If it going to be called Confab I want to make sure it works the same as the original. So...what do you think about merging this onto a branch? I hereby commit to sorting it out :-)
- Noel On 15 March 2013 19:26, Geoffrey Hutchison <geoff.hutchi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I dug up old versions of tree.hh from Cadabra . Luckily, it actually >> has the exact same files as Confab, but with a GPLv2-compliant >> license. Since the author of Cadabra is the same person as the author >> of tree.hh, I think these files should be considered cleanly under >> GPLv2. > > If the file header is labeled as GPLv2, the file is released (to the wild) > under GPLv2. Thanks for the investigation. > >> changeset at >> https://github.com/cowsandmilk/openbabel/commit/d27bb24dd2efa4304b369f4c3923c0ce43de97bb > > If Noel gives the go-ahead, I'd be happy to merge this into openbabel master. > I think it's much better to avoid an unmaintained confab fork. > > Thanks! > -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-discuss mailing list OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
