Hi David, Can you put all of the Confab-related code on a branch so I can get at them without pulling the other unrelated code on your master? Alternatively I can just copy+paste the files locally or if you know some other way I can get these changes using Git I'm happy to hear it.
- Noel On 15 March 2013 20:10, Noel O'Boyle <baoille...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks good, but not all the Confab code is in there. If it going to be > called Confab I want to make sure it works the same as the original. > So...what do you think about merging this onto a branch? I hereby > commit to sorting it out :-) > > - Noel > > On 15 March 2013 19:26, Geoffrey Hutchison <geoff.hutchi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I dug up old versions of tree.hh from Cadabra . Luckily, it actually >>> has the exact same files as Confab, but with a GPLv2-compliant >>> license. Since the author of Cadabra is the same person as the author >>> of tree.hh, I think these files should be considered cleanly under >>> GPLv2. >> >> If the file header is labeled as GPLv2, the file is released (to the wild) >> under GPLv2. Thanks for the investigation. >> >>> changeset at >>> https://github.com/cowsandmilk/openbabel/commit/d27bb24dd2efa4304b369f4c3923c0ce43de97bb >> >> If Noel gives the go-ahead, I'd be happy to merge this into openbabel >> master. I think it's much better to avoid an unmaintained confab fork. >> >> Thanks! >> -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-discuss mailing list OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
