Hi Peter, I guess if you're advertising this as a "cfml hosting" service i'd go with the root context. I think that is the norm that most developers who come to CF from a non J2EE background would understand.
I can't see many people wanting to have multiple cfml engines deployed in different contexts, however its completely foreseeable that someone might want cfml + a j2ee app in a different context - in which case they would be be looking for j2ee hosting I run a couple of servers, mainly for sites I develop but I do have some external clients and if i told them their CF apps had to reside in /cfml (or wherever) i doubt they would like it. To answer the question "which would i prefer", i guess the answer is i'd like the choice, maybe through a control panel or whatnot. No idea if thats even possible when dealing with a server running multiple vhosts (i assume). Is it all or nothing? Chris 2009/2/13 Peter Amiri <[email protected]> > > I would like to run a poll and get your collective opinions. I am > about to launch a web hosting company and will support Apache and > Tomcat services. I would luke to offer OpenBD services and am trying > to figure out how best to configure the services. Right now I am > leaning towards deploying the war file into a seperate context. This > would allow the users to deploy OpenBD, Railo, and COldFusion if they > so choose in their accounts. > > So my question is would you prefer the flexibility of having OpenBD > installed into a separate context or would you prefer to have it > installed into the ROOT context? > > -Peter > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
