Great feedback -- thanks Matt!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]>wrote: > Dakota Burns wrote: > >> Are their any downfalls to running Jetty versus Tomcat? >> > > Nope, really just comes down to personal preference. The big thing I always > hear about Jetty is that it's more "embeddable" and perhaps a bit more > lightweight than Tomcat, but I've had good luck with Tomcat personally. > Either one's a great choice. > > It seems to me that Jetty is a lightweight java server, and ... if it does >> the job -- why not consider as an option for running "as service" with >> OpenBD in addition to the manual "Ready2Run" package, which is great, by the >> way? >> > > The Ready2Run package is designed to give people an OpenBD bundle that > works more like what they might be familiar with from using ColdFusion, but > it's perfectly fine to use this in production if you like, meaning this > isn't a stripped-down version of Jetty or anything like that, it's just been > configured in a specific way so multiple contexts use the same OpenBD > instance. > > So you can use the Ready2Run version, or you can certainly grab Jetty and > deploy OpenBD as a WAR yourself, which may give you a bit more flexibility > depending on what you need to do with your server. > > You can certainly run Jetty as a service, which on Linux really just means > start it up when the machine boots. Looks like Jordan covered that really > well in the email that came in while I was typing this. ;-) > > -- > Matt Woodward > [email protected] > http://www.mattwoodward.com/blog > > Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, > etc. as attachments. > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
