On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Alan Williamson<[email protected]> wrote: > As for compatibility, that is an interesting one. I am not so keen to > be inserting known bugs into OpenBD just to be "bug-compatible" with > others, particularly when its an edge case that the vast majority of > developers probably will never even encounter.
You may find this is more common that you might expect :) It's certainly been long-standing behavior that I've seen in code other than my own... Since FW/1 works as-is on ColdFusion 8.0.1 and ColdFusion 9 Public Beta and Railo 3.1.x I think it is reasonable for me to declare OpenBD insufficiently compatible to be supported for now. I've already made a lot of syntax changes to try to run on OpenBD because of all the core language operators and constructs that are not supported (that were introduced in ColdFusion 8 and have been supported by Railo for quite a while). At least that's somewhat productive work since it might allow FW/1 to run on CF8.0.0 and CFMX 7... -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies US -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
