On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Woodward<[email protected]> wrote: > doing it right, let's just make sure no one ever has to touch old code > to get it working on new versions of CF. Might be a good decision for > sales, but it's sure as hell not a good decision for the language.
I guess it depends on whether you want people to move legacy code onto your engine... > If only there were a group of some sort that was set up to discuss and > make decisions on CFML language issues ... hmm ... If only we could get all the members of that group to vote... ;) OK, given that this basic null issue is not the root of the FW/1 problem - and that OpenBD exhibits exactly the same "bad behavior" you're now complaining about Adobe / Railo implementing(!) - let's get back to FW/1 and continue debugging so we don't get too far OT... -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies US -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
