Ok, I can understand that performance should be more important so if you don't find enough value on this patch, don't commit it. After all, it's now on the list archives for anyone to use it if needed :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:42 +0100, Alan Williamson wrote: > ;) we have to decide if we are going to accept it first of all. > > The ability to modify the index isn't a huge deal, but it will create > some performance overhead. We are having to retrieve it every time. > > In the 10+years of this implementation, i am surprised it has only come > up now, and to be quite honest, i am not at all keen in implementing it > just for one use case. The overhead will be significant in long loops. > > So ... for the time being, if it really is a big deal for you, then by > all means build your own JAR file -- the wonders of open source give you > that power. > > Personally, i would rework your CFML code a little to not require this > feature. > > Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > I've just made a patch to be able to modify the INDEX value. > > > > What's needed to get it committed? > -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon online manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
