On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Matthew Woodward wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, denstar wrote: ... >> For all intents and purposes, OBD is basically in the same boat as >> ACF, as far as CFE goes. > > Yeah, I really don't think that's true any longer, and at a minimum I think > you'll find we're a bit more receptive to discussion than Adobe would be on > that point. ;-)
Oy. I've tried coaxing Adobe into the mix for years now, and was only recently even acknowledged as existing. =)p I didn't mean to offend. I don't mean to offend Adobe heads either. I don't see it as an us versus them type of deal, at all. Working together-ish, there's more money, power, fame and what have you for all. And more people might just get exposed to the fun that is CFML. ... > Not enough regular Joes care about that stuff, but granted it's a hard sell > *until* they get bit by someone like Apple telling them what they can and > can't do with their music (just as one example). That's always a great "in" > to start talking about free software in general. I agree! And I think we're just seeing the beginnings of "normal" people caring about things like open standards, DRM, and privacy. God I hope so, at least. It's long past due. =) :Den -- We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. Plato -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon official manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/ Ready2Run CFML http://www.openbluedragon.org/openbdjam/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
