As much as adobe killing or abandoning cf might seem to hurt, it could potentially create a huge void that OpenBD could fill? With OpenBD 2.0 out, would it be wise for this community to start looking at how OpenBD could fill that void (instead of OpenBD going off in it's own direction).
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Dave Shuck <[email protected]> wrote: > Quite honestly I would be pretty surprised if there is a CF 11 and much > more so if it is released under Adobe. This writing on the wall, coupled > with the rapid progression of open source offerings are precisely why I > decided it was time to leave the Adobe DFWCFUG last year and start an engine > agnostic DFWCFML user group. While the topics are indistinguishable for the > most part, it was a stance I was trying to take saying "forget the engine > and promote the language" in hopes that we could have a strong ecosystem in > DFW when/if Adobe ultimately decided to pull the plug... or as they phrase > it "offer it to an open source foundation". > > > > @dshuck > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 cloud experts) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/15/adobe_donates_flex_sdk_to_open_source/ >> >> “It feels as though Adobe is completely abandoning Flex, and ultimately >> Flash … My company has invested millions into committing to Flex for our >> enterprise applications and now I don’t know what to tell them.” says Erich >> Cervantez, senior Flex developer for a large chain of health clubs. >> >> The question is of course ... are they about to do the same to ColdFusion? >> Could the next release be their last? >> >> -- >> official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ >> mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > > -- > official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
