Use visual vm to monitor and then create a dump and view with eclipse mat
plugin will show u exactly What's using what

A

On Wednesday, 3 October 2012, Peter J. Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andy Wu said the following on 10/03/2012 03:04 PM:
>>
>> Try using the same thread names or structdelete()'ing the data after
each thread run completes.
>
> Do you mean like this Andy?
>
> <cfcomponent>
>     <cffunction name = 'test' access='remote' returnformat='json'>
>
>         <cfset var ii = 0 />
>         <cfset var i = 0 />
>
>         <cfloop from="1" to="500000" index="ii">
>             <cfloop from="1" to="5" index="i">
>                 <cfthread action="run" name="thread#i#" outer="#ii#"
inner="#i#">
>                     <cfset console("running thread number #outer# -
#inner#") />
>                 </cfthread>
>             </cfloop>
>
>             <!--- We don't have to join individual threads, but all 5 at
once. Also no need to terminate them manually --->
>             <cfthread action="join"
name="thread1,thread2,thread3,thread4,thread5" />
>             <cfset StructDelete(cfthread, "thread1") />
>             <cfset StructDelete(cfthread, "thread2") />
>             <cfset StructDelete(cfthread, "thread3") />
>             <cfset StructDelete(cfthread, "thread4") />
>             <cfset StructDelete(cfthread, "thread5") />
>
>         </cfloop>
>
>         <cfreturn "done ;)" />
>     </cffunction>
> </cfcomponent>
>
> I tried this code in Java6 something and it actually crashed the JVM at
about 85,000 iterations (about 425k threads) with some error about the GC
sweeper.  Heap at about 3gb on Tomcat7 on Mint11 linux.
>
> Then I tried this code in the latest Java7 and it got to about 80,000
iterations before it started doing excessive GCs (because the console would
pause and then output a few hundred more log lines and then pause). Memory
was at 43% of total system memory. Then at 105,000 it started going really
fast again -- dropping memory down to 30% of total system. Then about at
165,000 it started being slow again.  I eventually had to kill the process
as it never resumed being fast again.
>
> @Andy, unless you have another idea -- it seems that the data is not
getting reaped by the GC.
>
> .pjf
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Peter J. Farrell
> OpenBD Steering Committee / Mach-II Lead Developer
> http://blog.maestropublishing.com
> Identi.ca / Twitter: @maestrofjp
>
> Please do not send me Microsoft Office/Apple iWork documents. Send
OpenDocument instead! http://fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument/
>
> --
> online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
> http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
>

-- 
Alex Skinner
Managing Director
Pixl8 Interactive

Tel: +448452600726
Email: [email protected]
Web: pixl8.co.uk

-- 
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

Reply via email to