This is how it should be. The ability to pick and choose the right tool
for the job at hand.
Warm Regards,
Jordan Michaels
On 03/15/2014 07:18 PM, Alan Holden wrote:
I'm not sure if I would characterize it as outright "hostility".
OpenBD is a nice package that's easy to customize, bundle and deploy.
But honestly, it probably does have some more idiosyncrasies - and seems
a bit more finicky in some areas - than the other engines. This results
in some more noise and frustration, but I'm not sure they all get
hostile. They probably just go over to Railo.
It's nice for me to have more than one tool in the box. When the client
wants ACF, I'm all for it. When I need a fast web standalone to deploy
as a WAR, I'll go with OpenBD. When I need a multiple-app platform with
Mura or RO support (or an ACF changeover), I opt for Railo.
Al
--
--
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open BlueDragon" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
