Just out of curiosity, I assume it doesn’t complain about the definition, just the usage? In which case using variables.isUserLoggedIn() should work, rather than renaming it?
Sean On Aug 4, 2015, at 7:58 AM, Ben <[email protected]> wrote: > Just so that you all are aware, with the addition of this function to the > nightly builds, it breaks the administrator. The administrator has the same > function name in a cfc and with the nightly, it thinks that you are never > logged in. I've fixed it in mine by changes the few references in the > administrator to be isAdminUserLoggedIn instead of isUserLoggedIn. -- -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open BlueDragon" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
