Maybe, but renaming it makes sure no one confuses it in the future as well as fixes the problem at hand.
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 1:41:57 PM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, I assume it doesn’t complain about the definition, > just the usage? In which case using variables.isUserLoggedIn() should work, > rather than renaming it? > > Sean > > On Aug 4, 2015, at 7:58 AM, Ben <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Just so that you all are aware, with the addition of this function to > the nightly builds, it breaks the administrator. The administrator has the > same function name in a cfc and with the nightly, it thinks that you are > never logged in. I've fixed it in mine by changes the few references in > the administrator to be isAdminUserLoggedIn instead of isUserLoggedIn. > > -- -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open BlueDragon" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
