> Just my two cents: and also include a new field "QA responsible" to > assign the person who is in charge of verify it? It will help us a lot > in our daily work verifying fixes. Yes, I think it makes a lot of sense. This means that this person will be in charge of the "ready for review" (or "Auto tested") status. And it doesn't necessarily have to be a functional test, it can also be a code review process.
Thanks, Juan Pablo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Openbravo-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbravo-development
