Hi Gorka, On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Gorka Gil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Brian, > > Sorry for the delay in the answer, we were very busy with the launch > of Openbravo 3 (RC4), which is a significant milestone in our product > roadmap. > > No worries, I'm just glad it wasn't me this time :-) > It has been our pleasure to work with you, Canonical and Ubuntu. > > The same is true vice-versa too, I assure you. > Going to details: > > > * It seems you still embed jquery.js. Any chance I can nudge you to > using the packaged version in our archive instead? (the same for dojo and > dijit) > > Unfortunately no, because we need very specific versions that we > update in every minor release. The situation here hasn't changed > compared to our previous major version. > > Ok, not a huge issue there. > > * There are many empty dirs in the package which IIRC goes back to your > method of copying files over from one place to another. Is this correct? I > would really like to discuss this again. > > Yes, that's correct. The root cause is the same as in 2.50: Openbravo > cannot delegate the updates to apt, this is why we must do this. > > More on this below. > > * We are trying to move init scripts to upstart scripts. Would you be > opposed to doing this? > > We don't have any impediments, the only thing is that the packages in > which we depend on (Apache, Tomcat and Postgres) still don't use it in > natty. We'd prefer to move to upstart once they do it, to avoid any > possible inconsistencies. > > That should be fine. I honestly don't care but there has been a push on me lately. Your reasoning seems valid though. > > * There are numerous files in the package in both compressed and > uncompressed form. One or the other should likely be removed. > > Could you send us a list of the files? So that we can evaluate them. > Odd, I don't see them in the DEB i pulled from the PPA but I do when I build the package locally. I have attached the file. > > > * Your desktop file calls x-www-browser but should instead follow the > following format: > > [Desktop Entry] > > Encoding=UTF-8 > > Icon=/opt/kde3/share/apps/kdesktop/pics/ksslogo.png > > Type=Link > > URL=http://www.kde.org/ > > We have tried to use Type=Link but it doesn't work. We have placed > your example into /usr/share/applications and also don't appear in the > menu. > Are we missing anything? > I think i must be missing something :-) You are correct, it is hidden. (this used to, and according to spec still should work) I have contacted one of our core devs for assistance; in the meantime, we'll ignore it. > > > * Lintian overrides (debian/openbravo-3.lintian-overrides) should be > added for the remainder of items (and commented on as to why the override is > being added) in the lintian output that aren't actually problems. i.e. > dir-or-file-in-opt, script-not-executable, extra-license-file, > unknown-section, etc... > > Ok, done. > Has this been built yet? I don't see the overrides included. Also, one other thing I noticed that I didn't before: You include the BSD license. If you don't mind, please remove it and instead in your copyright refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD. (I know, I'm nit-picking you to death but want this to go through the first shot if possible) Thanks! -Brian > > Regards, > Gorka > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:49, Brian Thomason > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Juan, > > Just wanted to check back in as I haven't heard from you in a while. > > Regards, > > Brian > > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Juan Pablo Aroztegi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Brian, > >> > >> Do you have any updates on this? We've also pushed a beta package for > >> Natty, so that we can be there from day-1. Do you see this as feasible? > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Juan Pablo > >> > >> On 14:01 Thu 13 Jan , Juan Pablo Aroztegi wrote: > >> > Hi Brian, > >> > > >> > We've packaged and tested the new version of the package we talked > about > >> > some weeks ago: openbravo-3. Both for Lucid and Maverick. From our > side > >> > it's ready to be pushed into the Partner's repository. Would it be > >> > possible for you to review and push the package? > >> > > >> > Our plans are to maintain the openbravo-erp package for Karmic, Lucid > >> > and Maverick until their EOL. And this new openbravo-3 for Lucid, > >> > Maverick, Natty and the future Ubuntu releases. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thank you! > >> > > >> > Juan Pablo > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv > >> Post to : [email protected] > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > >
openbravo-list
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
