I forgot my "more on this below" :-) I know you've explained it a number of times, but can you detail for me again why you're moving files around in the way you are? I might be able to come up with a better solution. It was a major sticking point with our archive admins last go around and I'd like to improve the situation with the -3 package if at all possible.
Thanks again! -Brian On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Brian Thomason <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Gorka, > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Gorka Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Brian, >> >> Sorry for the delay in the answer, we were very busy with the launch >> of Openbravo 3 (RC4), which is a significant milestone in our product >> roadmap. >> >> > No worries, I'm just glad it wasn't me this time :-) > > >> It has been our pleasure to work with you, Canonical and Ubuntu. >> >> > The same is true vice-versa too, I assure you. > > >> Going to details: >> >> > * It seems you still embed jquery.js. Any chance I can nudge you to >> using the packaged version in our archive instead? (the same for dojo and >> dijit) >> >> Unfortunately no, because we need very specific versions that we >> update in every minor release. The situation here hasn't changed >> compared to our previous major version. >> >> > Ok, not a huge issue there. > > >> > * There are many empty dirs in the package which IIRC goes back to your >> method of copying files over from one place to another. Is this correct? I >> would really like to discuss this again. >> >> Yes, that's correct. The root cause is the same as in 2.50: Openbravo >> cannot delegate the updates to apt, this is why we must do this. >> >> > More on this below. > > >> > * We are trying to move init scripts to upstart scripts. Would you be >> opposed to doing this? >> >> We don't have any impediments, the only thing is that the packages in >> which we depend on (Apache, Tomcat and Postgres) still don't use it in >> natty. We'd prefer to move to upstart once they do it, to avoid any >> possible inconsistencies. >> >> > That should be fine. I honestly don't care but there has been a push on me > lately. Your reasoning seems valid though. > > >> > * There are numerous files in the package in both compressed and >> uncompressed form. One or the other should likely be removed. >> >> Could you send us a list of the files? So that we can evaluate them. >> > > Odd, I don't see them in the DEB i pulled from the PPA but I do when I > build the package locally. I have attached the file. > > >> >> > * Your desktop file calls x-www-browser but should instead follow the >> following format: >> > [Desktop Entry] >> > Encoding=UTF-8 >> > Icon=/opt/kde3/share/apps/kdesktop/pics/ksslogo.png >> > Type=Link >> > URL=http://www.kde.org/ >> >> We have tried to use Type=Link but it doesn't work. We have placed >> your example into /usr/share/applications and also don't appear in the >> menu. >> Are we missing anything? >> > > I think i must be missing something :-) You are correct, it is hidden. > (this used to, and according to spec still should work) I have contacted one > of our core devs for assistance; in the meantime, we'll ignore it. > > >> >> > * Lintian overrides (debian/openbravo-3.lintian-overrides) should be >> added for the remainder of items (and commented on as to why the override is >> being added) in the lintian output that aren't actually problems. i.e. >> dir-or-file-in-opt, script-not-executable, extra-license-file, >> unknown-section, etc... >> >> Ok, done. >> > > Has this been built yet? I don't see the overrides included. > > Also, one other thing I noticed that I didn't before: You include the BSD > license. If you don't mind, please remove it and instead in your copyright > refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD. (I know, I'm nit-picking you to > death but want this to go through the first shot if possible) > > Thanks! > > -Brian > > >> >> Regards, >> Gorka >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:49, Brian Thomason >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Juan, >> > Just wanted to check back in as I haven't heard from you in a while. >> > Regards, >> > Brian >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Juan Pablo Aroztegi >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Brian, >> >> >> >> Do you have any updates on this? We've also pushed a beta package for >> >> Natty, so that we can be there from day-1. Do you see this as feasible? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Juan Pablo >> >> >> >> On 14:01 Thu 13 Jan , Juan Pablo Aroztegi wrote: >> >> > Hi Brian, >> >> > >> >> > We've packaged and tested the new version of the package we talked >> about >> >> > some weeks ago: openbravo-3. Both for Lucid and Maverick. From our >> side >> >> > it's ready to be pushed into the Partner's repository. Would it be >> >> > possible for you to review and push the package? >> >> > >> >> > Our plans are to maintain the openbravo-erp package for Karmic, Lucid >> >> > and Maverick until their EOL. And this new openbravo-3 for Lucid, >> >> > Maverick, Natty and the future Ubuntu releases. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thank you! >> >> > >> >> > Juan Pablo >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv >> >> Post to : [email protected] >> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv >> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv >> > Post to : [email protected] >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >> > >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openbravo-isv More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
