Hi Nico, On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:06:54PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> But thinking more about this... does it really make sense to store > anything but control data and the actual PDU in the database? When sending > a message from the vty the message is encoded anyway, so just inserting > the PDU + control data should be sufficient. I'm not sure if OpenBSC has > to be aware of things like UDHI, UDH, PID and thelike. well, what you definitely want aside from the PDU is 'valid_until', which is a result of PDU parsing... But yes, generally, * there should be no decoded SMS in the database (and if it is, only for debugging, i.e. no code should ever use the human-readable decode * there should be no direct references to the subscriber table (sender_id/receiver_id). Rather, the actual phone number (MSISDN) should be used. -- - Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
