On 7/16/12 8:48 PM, Gus Bourg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Labs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Another thing is that if you use a nanoBTS on DCS1900 for example will be >> much better in Europe because you will not interfere with any operator. I am >> not sure if 850 and 1900 is even used in EU. Maybe somebody on the list can >> clarify this. > > Part of DCS1800 (downlink) and PCS1900 (uplink) do overlap. > > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSM_frequency_bands
So, it would be possible to configure a nanoBTS for uses in Europe by only using certain ARFCN allocation, avoiding overlapping frequency with Telco's assigned frequency? -naif
