On 16 July 2012 22:00, Gus Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, it would be possible to configure a nanoBTS for uses in Europe by >> only using certain ARFCN allocation, avoiding overlapping frequency with >> Telco's assigned frequency? >> >> -naif >> > > Looks possible, but take into account that PCS1900 (downlink) also > overlaps with IMT2100 (uplink). > > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMTS_frequency_bands > > Also, just because the band might not be used for GSM applications, > doesn't mean it's not licensed for other use in your country. > Certainly the best way to be sure that you're not interfering is to > have a test license and/or run your gear in an appropriate cage.
Indeed, hence my question about whether they are permanently fixed to one band. I don't intend to radiate unless I'm licensed or the band/use is exempt. Thank you all for the replies. Regards, Andrew -- Andrew Back http://carrierdetect.com
