On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 19:53, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Willmann <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > looks all fine except for the function name. Something more expressive
> > would be nice - how about gsm340_validity_period_as_ts()?
> 
> I'm not sure "as_ts" is really more expressive,

> gsm340_validity_period_unix_time() would be more expressive, but it's
> also painfully long. I would suggest:
>  - gsm340_validity_time()

I like that one.


Regards,
-- 
- Daniel Willmann <[email protected]>       http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Schivelbeiner Str. 5
* 10439 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte

Reply via email to