On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:24:57AM +0200, ☎ wrote: > Good catch, I didn't notice it. Maybe we should just use size_t for all the > length > functions in libosmo*? That's what size_t was invented for after all :)
> > it looks like a candidate for ping-pong games on 32bit/64bit userland > > on GNU/Linux. What is the type here? unsigned int - size_t? I can't quote the ISO C specification. So what type is the result of "unsigned int - size_t"? We have size_t, off_t, ptrdiff_t as potential types. I don't know which is the right one. :)
