On Thursday 2014-10-23 14:39, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: >On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:24:57AM +0200, ☎ wrote: > >> Good catch, I didn't notice it. Maybe we should just use size_t for all the >> length >> functions in libosmo*? That's what size_t was invented for after all :) > >> > it looks like a candidate for ping-pong games on 32bit/64bit userland >> > on GNU/Linux. What is the type here? unsigned int - size_t? > >I can't quote the ISO C specification. So what type is the result of >"unsigned int - size_t"?
size_t, because it is of higher rank. (The specifier to use is %zu.)
