From: Max <[email protected]>

Previously the presence of header and data blocks were communicated
in-band which decreases code readability and makes it unnecessary hard
to add support for new hardware.

Note: both OsmoBTS and OsmoPCU have to be modified to take advantage of
extended ph_data_param structure.
---
 include/osmocom/gsm/l1sap.h | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/osmocom/gsm/l1sap.h b/include/osmocom/gsm/l1sap.h
index 9f3fe98..1af8ba8 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/gsm/l1sap.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/gsm/l1sap.h
@@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ enum osmo_mph_info_type {
        PRIM_INFO_DEACT_CIPH,   /*!< \brief Deactivation of ciphering */
 };

+/*! \brief PH-DATA presence information */
+enum osmo_ph_pres_info_type {
+       PRES_INFO_INVALID = 0,  /*!< \brief Data is invalid */
+       PRES_INFO_HEADER  = 1,  /*!< \brief Only header is present and valid */
+       PRES_INFO_FIRST   = 3,  /*!< \brief First half of data + header are 
valid (2nd half may be present but invalid) */
+       PRES_INFO_SECOND  = 5,  /*!< \brief Second half of data + header are 
valid (1st halfmay be present but invalid) */
+       PRES_INFO_BOTH    = 7,  /*!< \brief Both parts + header are present and 
valid */
+       PRES_INFO_UNKNOWN
+};
+
 /*! \brief for PH-RANDOM_ACCESS.req */
 struct ph_rach_req_param {
        uint8_t ra;             /*!< \brief Random Access */
@@ -48,6 +58,7 @@ struct ph_data_param {
        uint8_t chan_nr;        /*!< \brief Channel Number (Like RSL) */
        uint32_t fn;            /*!< \brief GSM Frame Number */
        int8_t rssi;            /*!< \brief RSSI of receivedindication */
+       enum osmo_ph_pres_info_type pdch_presence_info; /*!< \brief Info 
regarding presence/validity of header and data parts */
 };

 /*! \brief for TCH.{req,ind} | TCH-RTS.ind */
-- 
2.7.1

Reply via email to