On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:40:12PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > + LOGP(DL1C, LOGL_NOTICE, "Ignoring phy link %d instance %d " > + "because no TRX associated with it\n", plink->num, > pinst->num);
"no TRX is associated" ?
^^
oh well, I'm starting to split hairs again.
~Neels
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
