Hi Max,

regarding the original patch:

* the commit message fails to explain why this fixes a segfault,
  and when that segfault occurs
* if Neels provides some feedback like the one he did, please follow-up
  to that to keep progress on this patch going.

If the OSMO_ASSERT() in the original code was wrong, then please explain
why it was wrong.  This explanation belongs in the commit log message.

Also, as trx_lc15l1_hdl() can now return NULL, did you verify that all
callers of that function can actually deal with a NULL return value?

Regards,
        Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <[email protected]>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Reply via email to