On 01-10-30 22:02:15 CET, Massimiliano Pala wrote: > Having all the files within the same directory allows for very simple > "removal" of the package from the system as you always get the /usr/local/bin > ever growing and, if not using a package manager (rpm, pkg, etc...) > you almost certainly will live with unused binaries in the system...
see, that's why i dislike having the openca modules in the standard place: i'm not aware of any perl module manager. btw: ..> ls -l /usr/local/bin total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 14 Jun 8 2000 perl -> ../../bin/perl* ..> > > so what are the fs layouts we want openca to fit in? > > I would like to have openca to respect the default layout as much as what do you mean by "the default layout"? the specific layout of the respective host OS (or distribution in case of linux)? > possible, anyway with the possibility to prefix them with, let's > say, the default "openca" -- just as apache, openssl and other > packages. with apache and openssl you name the two exeptions to the rule of package installation paths. :-) rj -- Real programmers confuse Christmas and Halloween, because Dec 25 == Oct 31. _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
