On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 06:05, Michael Bell wrote:
I finished a first version OpenCA::OpenSSL::Fast and start including it into OpenCA::OpenSSL. This will speedup the parsing. So perhaps you have not to serialize X509 objects.
I will try it, it sure will be a boost of performance.
Now I have the next problem. OpenCA::OpenSSL and OpenCA::OpenSSL::Fast need less than 0.03 seconds to completely parse 20 requests but OpenCA::REQ still need 1.2 seconds. So I checked the module again for some optimizations. The result is that Parse::ReqDescent needs up to 80 percent of the time. I have no idea why it takes so long and how we can solve this problem.
- I think private keys should be handled in a way similar to X509, there is something already done in the proyect?
No.
What do you think about it? You consider it good/necessary/unuseful?
The question is what do you want to do with the keys? X509 and REQ etc. were created because they are core objects of a CA. If you have to handle a lot of keys then it makes sense. We store the keys in the request and x509 objects too.
Michael -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Bell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZE Computer- und Medienservice Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482 (Computing Centre) Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2704 Humboldt-University of Berlin Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany http://www.openca.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
