Michael Bell wrote:
Do you think we should move the added function libDBGetLastDefinedItem to misc-utils?Well, when I started the misc-utils lib it was for generic porpouses, we
could think of having a db-utils lib as there are a few functions strictly
db-related. What do you think about this ?
Perhaps we have to create more seperate libs because we "lost" the most time through the loading of (often unnecessary) libraries. The only question is how to manage this.
Any good ideas? One lib per function is perhaps too much. We have 140-150 commands and 120-130 functions in the libraries. If we do a total seperation then every function must include the necessary other functions by itself. Do you think it is a good idea? I'm not really sure about this.
Bahaa, you requested such a change for the modules. What do you think about such a change for the libraries?
Michael
P.S. dozens of libDBGetLastItem.sub or .lib files would have at minimum one advantage - we would eliminate all functions which are defined twice or are never used ;)
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZE Computer- und Medienservice Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482
(Computing Centre) Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2704
Humboldt-University of Berlin
Unter den Linden 6
10099 Berlin Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Germany http://www.openca.org
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
