Hi all
I agree with Michael as it is not such a good idea to have a separate
lib for each function and here is why. each time we need these libs the system will have to make a separate IO call to the kernel, and
that comes with it's own set of delays. Making small but many file reads has worst performance than making few but larger file reads.
We could rethink the arrangement of the functions in the libs and
maybe come up with more efficient arrangement, and we can load only
needed libs for a cmd. another idea is what if we do away with libs
and add all the functions to the appropriate modules. that would
improve performance especially if one uses mod_perl
Ok, I'm a fan of classes and we heavily work on the HTML output actually. So what do you think about two classes OpenCA::UI::HTML which include all HTML output functionalities and OpenCA::Utilities which include the stuff from misc-utils etc.?
These classes would reduce the loading time dramtically if mod_perl is activated. Another problem is the crypto library. Parts of this library are OpenSSL specific and must be moved to OpenCA::OpenSSL or OpenCA::Token::OpenSSL. Other parts can be integrated into OpenCA::Utilities. If we move these libraris then we get a problem with our conventional configurationfiles.
Any comments about these ideas?
Michael -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Bell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZE Computer- und Medienservice Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482 (Computing Centre) Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2704 Humboldt-University of Berlin Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany http://www.openca.org
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
