Hi all

Michael has a point here. I think it is a good idea to have an openca server, but I 
have questions my self  
1. are we still going to use catch
2. is there a possibility to combine the two (openca+ catch)
3. can we use TCP socket? this will be useful in large computing environments where 
one can make use of high performance computing not so much for the CA but it would 
help for the RA.


best regards
Bahaa Al-amood

> 
> I started to think about some radical ideas to solve our performance
> problems. All actual ideas do the same - we try to optimize the
> initialization. The simple question is why does the 
> initialization time
> be a problem for a server if it starts it's normal operation after a
> while? Really simple because OpenCA is no server! So what about a real
> OpenCA server?
> 
> The idea is a module OpenCA::IPC. We can derive this module from
> OpenCA::XML::Cache which already includes a fast server. This module
> would have the following functions:
> 
> - getRequest ();
> - setRequest ("...");
> - getAnswer ();
>    returns undef on end of message
> - setAnswer ("...");
>    used to send partial results (replacement for print)
> - flushAnswer();
>    send empty or only partially filled message to signal end of answer
>    (replacement for exit and die)
> - new (TYPE    => (SERVER|CLIENT),
>         SERVICE => "a name to create the unix socket",
>         TMP_DIRECTORY => "openca/tmp");
> - kill (SERVICE => "a name to find the unix socket and pid",
>          TMP_DIRECTORY => "openca/tmp");
> 
> The clients are normal CGI-scripts which always call the server
> and send them the cookie ID plus all the data from POST or GET
> via Perl's CGI module. The server sends back a string which will
> be directly printed.
> 
> The string will be created on the server if all print statements to
> STDOUT will be changed to '$main::global_stdout .= "...";'. 
> The question
> is now what to do. We have an official feature freeze for 0.9.2 but we
> have a problem with the performance. There are four major changes:
> 
> 1. OpenCA::IPC - derived from OpenCA::XML::Cache
> 2. some changes in initCGI because it will only called from the server
>     mainly an additional while loop for the server
> 3. initClient which creates the request (really small)
> 4. change the print statements in all libs and cmds
> 
> The question is what is more important - a fast release or an 
> acceptable
> performance? Perhaps we should ask the users (openca-users)?
> 
> A notice for all people who are not directly coding for OpenCA - the
> change is really radical in terms of the philosophy and an 
> investment in
> the future because after the change OpenCA is a real server by itself
> not only by Apache! The question is now; is it better to build first a
> stable release 0.9.2 or come closer do a final design.
> 
> Perhaps I should send this to openca-core first but I think 
> it is a good
> idea to discuss this completely in the public.
> 
> So finally, please send comments - especially those guys who 
> use or want
> to use the software for large installations and mission 
> critical systems.
> 
> Michael
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Bell                   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ZE Computer- und Medienservice            Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482
> (Computing Centre)                        Fax:  +49 (0)30-2093 2704
> Humboldt-University of Berlin
> Unter den Linden 6
> 10099 Berlin                   Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Germany                                       http://www.openca.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Bell                   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ZE Computer- und Medienservice            Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482
> (Computing Centre)                        Fax:  +49 (0)30-2093 2704
> Humboldt-University of Berlin
> Unter den Linden 6
> 10099 Berlin                   Email (private): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Germany                                       http://www.openca.org
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> OpenCA-Devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel

Reply via email to