Hi Oli, >> Yes, but it is a problem for the old behaviour too. "_" can be part of >> the user ID and the process ID. So I would prefer something like >> userid/processid/certid.p12. This would avoid naming conflicts. > > ok - this is right but I am not happy with the directory solution. Whats > about the HTML Way and escape the "_" char, or lets simply forbid this > character - I dont see any problems with this...
I would prefer in this case an escaped or otherwise protected "_" character. Limitations always cause problems in the future. > BTW one process can include only one key but several certificates. hmm, > not with the current batch model but possible... > Whats about using a tar archive an put p12 and some describing data > together ? If we allow the renewal of a batch certificate then we have this situation. A tar archive sounds like a good idea because such an archive would allow the packaging of all data into one file (e.g. p12, cert pure, encrypted PIN mail, info mail ...). This would ease the integration into other management systems perhaps too. Michael -- Michael Bell Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
