it seems that the patch does not help my situation. I am not using an external database. I am using the default OpenCA DB.
Do you know what the error "There is no special DN specified" means? It is what is displayed just before the error 32.
Nicholas
PS. Are there major advantages why I should use mySQL instead of the default DB? My implementation is not a large scale one. It is just for the purposes of demonstrating this for my graduate project. Does the default DB cause any problems that an external database doesn't? (Like in my case, the patch doesn't work ;) )
PS2. I don't know if I should have done something different with the patch. What I did was replace DBI.pm in my openca installation directory (wherever it existed). I also tried to reinstall with the new DBI.pm in the sources.
Adding valid CA-certificates to the LDAP server ...
Certificate 0 FAILED (error 32: No such object)"
I have nearly the same problem in OpenCA 0.9.2. I backported a really small patch to OpenCA 0.9.1. I attached a modified OpenCA::DBI. If you make a diff then you will see that it is only minimal but the result is drastical on systems like postgres. To be more exact - my new CA uses postgresql and during the import of the configuration I had the problem and fixed it.
Does the patch help and do you use PostgreSQL?
Michael
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Openca-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users
