>>We
>>also need to finalize a decision on how we decide who gets a license. In
>>the process of this we got onto leadership and then encryption. Since then
>>the list hasn't been too active.
>
> DeRobertis: OK, as far as encryption, we need a better algorithm. I'd suggest
we just
> see about using PGP.
>
> DeRobertis: PGP can authenticate messages based on a public key. Everyone
would need
> only to sign their votes with their private key and the public key could be
> stored in the stack.
>
> DeRobertis: I don't have much time to investigate, but look at
<http://www.pgp.com> and
> <http://www.pgpi.com/>.
>
> DeRobertis: Anyway, conversation has died down and I'd like to get that vote
done.
> Adrian, would you be willing to do a hand tally? My public key is appended
> below. And it's a nice 4096-bit key :)
Adrian: I'll take a look at PGP and see if I can work it out, it's actually
based on the RSA public key method that I unsuccessfully tried to implement.
If I can work it out (and I think I should be able to) I'd be happy to take
the vote. I may even be able to automate this voting process which would be
extremely secure (unless I decided to abuse my position, which I'm not going
to). Hmm, have to look into that as well.
