Re: OODL: OODL - Distributed Collaboration

[Dylan Just]

At 10:05 am 01/06/99 +1100, you wrote:
>> >Hmmm.. I guess we'd need some type of run-time include feature. A script
>> >could (for it's duration), use commands from a library.
>> >
>> >It would be sort of like a CFM lib.
>>
>> Anthony,
>>
>>  Wouldn't "start using" be just fine? Of course we could add some
>> "auto-start-using" property that automatically starts using a stack and
>> stops it again when any handler in some script is run. But that's a case
>> for the xTalk list.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- M. Uli Kusterer
>
>I don't get all this include stuff. No language without header files uses
>it. Any source code in the one project are compiled together generally. The
>functions should be called anyway. What is the point really? Are there any
>benefits of adding a line that doesn't do anything?
>
>Andre
>
I agree.  We're really talking about a load of bullshit that's unimportant
@ this stage.  How about a "file view" of all the files included.  We can
drag-drop and import.  Wouldn't that suit the purpose much better?