At 3:26 PM +0200 on 6/13/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>>It is becomming increasingly apparent that I made a mistake somewhere in
>>the pseudo-Memory Manager which is a part of the Interperpreter port. It's
>>trying to allocate some 800MB os RAM and I (as of yet) can't figure out
>>why.
>
>Anthony,
>
> do you want to say you re-implemented the memory manager APIs under Linux?
>Shouldn't we use ANSI instead for better portability?
Instead of rewriting several significant parts of the interpreter, I
created a Handle-compatable thing using ANSI calls. It allows one to keep
the better memory management of handles on OS's that support them and use
the ANSI code on OS's that don't.
