At 8:50 AM -0700 on 7/10/99, Rob Cozens wrote:
>>A is not A. Wonderfull.
>
>You're beginning to catch on, Anthony:
>
>A is not A.
>
>A is not not A.
>
>A is not both A and not A.
>
>A is neither A nor not A.
I call that nonsence. And I'll happily test my theory that that is nonsence
by throwing a brick (which is neither a brick nor not a brick, and which
neither exists nor not exists) at anyone who exists (but neither exists nor
not exists) and see if they feel (or neither feel or not feel) any pain
(which neither exists nor not exits), which they (neither existing nor not
existing) will neither feel nor not feel.
Makes a hell of a lot of sence, no? You can't be serious.... if you are,
I've got some news for you: A is A. Let me ask my compiler:
#include <iostream.h>
int main() {
int a;
const char *tfarray[] = {"false", "true"};
cout << tfarray[(a==a)] << endl;
cout.flush();
return 0;
}
Guess what it says :)
>
>Read the book.
Why would I get a book when I can get a random sentence generator to spew
out stuff far more sane? And which book do you expect me to read?
