At 11:20 AM -0700 on 7/11/99, Rob Cozens wrote:
>I am witholding more specific comments for the time being until it becomes
>clear whether the thread goes off list. In the meantime I would offer
>these thoughts:
>
>1. While I think it has reached the stage where the subject should be
>seperated from day-to-day correspondence, I also think it is most
>appropriate that members of this group continue sharing their thoughts.
>This is not a list where newbies ask for assistance. This is a smaller
>group focused on a long-term, world-class, joint creative effort. Letting
>our hair down philosophically can only improve our teamwork and
>commitment...so long as it is taken in the right spirit.
True. I must agree. We'll probably get to know each other a lot better, and
so long as we avoid name calling and flaming (which we've done so far) I
doubt we'll make enemies.
I fully support a war of ideas (though not a war of swords).
>To my mind, even
>lurkers will understand a lot more about OC if they follow the discussion.
>
>2. I would like to make it clear to all who don't follow the discussion
>(and probably aren't reading this) that, while from the drift of the
>discussion so far it doesn't sound like Anthony or moi will be supporting
>each other's bid for political office, I recognize Anthony's tremendous
>contributions to the project and wholeheartedly support him in his role.
Thankyou.
>
>...after all, in the reality visited by human programmers, A is A :{`)
LOL.
I'll give you one concession: If you create your own universe, you can
create your own laws of logic (or physics, for that matter) ;-). But in
this one, I think A is A.
