> >It is, you can just something thing in a few ways. Underneath that it is as
> >structured as any other language.
>
> It has a basic structure, but many object descriptors ("there is a[n]
> <object>"), functions ("the number of card buttons") and almost all
> commands are exceptions, as they don't follow any formal syntax. This makes
> it so complicated to cast it into a formal syntax.
Not true. The lexical analyzer would phrase all those different ways of talking
about an object into one. A few functions are needed to get the number of
buttons on a card which would amount to getting some data from a private
variable in a class somewhere. Commands that use strange keywords can analyze
the tokens as a command by command basis like the little-c interpreter does. I
still don't see the problem.
