>True. But there is also the problem of keeping relevant sources for three
>years... I'd hate to have to dig up Interpreter sources from today three
>years from now... and I could not, for example, dig up ANY ResCraft sources
>>from last October. Now I actually plan to keep them (on CD-R, not much
>choice <g>)...but, it would be a pain to dig up old sources. And if sources
>are lost? I think we'd be better off having it so that a wide distribution
>mechanism is encouraged. And besides, downloading is often faster <g>...
>Ok, I've rambled enough. I guess I just would not like having to deal with
>requests from three years ago.
Anthony,
I hope we can have this clause interpreted (changed) so it lets us ship
the current sources, and not those from 3 years ago ?
>Oh! _Now_ you tell me not to put the cat in! <g> But we don't want to get
>sued in the afforementioned legal(?) system.
Yup, we don't want to be sued. But can anybody sue us because we send them
a CD-R or maybe some files they don't know what to do with? If we have a
disclaimer of liability like every sane person distributing in the US, we
should be safe in this regard.
> sound I/O for each OS
> graphics for each OS
> interpreter
> editor
> viewer
> etc.
if we used wxWindows we'd have a lot less files, because we'd simply point
people at the wxWindows web site.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
