At 4:53 PM +0100 on 11/8/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
> I think it'd be smarter to limit the number of partners. They should be a
>slim acting body. They have few rights associates don't also have. Say,
>maximum 20 partners. That'd be enough for the main coordinators and a
>well-sized UI team that needs to be partners so MC have someone to talk to.
>More won't be needed right now, and if it is, we'll surely get an unanimous
>vote to extend it.
Uli, this is in need of optimization. Consider: If 20 partners want more
than 20 partners, they can have more -- they have unamity, they can change
the agreement. If they don't want more, they don't get more -- it requires
unamity.
There is no need for a limit. It is just extra words, which are without any
real meaning.
