In a message dated 11/14/99 2:52:24 AM, you wrote: <<Since we are revisiting this conversation, I have two questions: 1) Whatever happened to our tentative decision to use the Public Domain license? This seems to have everything we are committed to. You can always have a "free" version available to you.>> well, yeah, but lets say I want to make ClarisOffice 2001, I wanna give VB for Apps a run for it's money, so I integrate NuCard with ClarisOffice. It's in the NuCard consortium to have this done (publicizes nuCard and allows nuCard to work with ClarisOffic), and it couldn't be done with a PD license because if nuCard was PD, ClarisOffice would be too.
- OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Scott Raney
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Scott Raney
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? MP0werd
