At 3:03 AM -0500 on 11/14/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >well, yeah, but lets say I want to make ClarisOffice 2001, I wanna give VB >for Apps a run for it's money, so I integrate NuCard with ClarisOffice. It's >in the NuCard consortium to have this done (publicizes nuCard and allows >nuCard to work with ClarisOffic), and it couldn't be done with a PD license >because if nuCard was PD, ClarisOffice would be too. Not true. Just because I integrate some PD code does not mean my product becomes public domain. You can do anything with PD code -- including put it into a copyrighted product. You retain the copyright to your code, the PD code remains copyrightless, but you own the collection of the two.
- OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Scott Raney
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? Scott Raney
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: GCC is GPL so why aren't we? MP0werd
