>Alain: While Scott is quite open to just about
>anything that is reasonable (non-restrictive), I
>imagine that he might want to have a say in this
>matter. This doesn't resolve the objective versus
>subjective issue, however. (e.g. who will set the
>criteria to evaluate a candidate's merit?)
Folks,
I think it'd be smartest to just let Scott decide this. If someone on the
list decides he wants to take part in developing the UI, he has to tell us
about it, and what he intends to do (e.g. show us a sketch of a new menu
layout he'd want to implement) and if we like it we go to Scott and ask him
whether he'd shell out another license for that person. It would thus be a
per-person contract.
This is practicable, since this kind of collaboration with MC will only
happen as long as OpenCard is not finished. When it is, we'll do our
development in OC and someone else would have to convert it into a MetaCard
project.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
